Put one question to a panel of 3 different AI models and get a single verdict back. Each model answers independently, then a chair synthesizes: verdict, confidence, the points they all agreed on, the dissent, and what would flip the answer. Use it for judgement calls where one model's opinion is not enough: is this safe, is this worth it, which option. No account, no API key, one USDC micropayment per call.

The deep council: 4 different AI models, two rounds. Each seat answers, then sees the other seats' positions and revises - so you get a verdict that survived cross-examination, with changed_after_debate on each seat and the dissent that held. For decisions where being wrong is expensive.

The grounded council: we buy the facts first, then deliberate on them. Your question is scanned for a contract address, URL or $TICKER; we spend on the matching evidence (honeypot simulation, sanctions screen, page content, SEC profile), hand it to one analyst that judges on what was found, not on recollection. The response lists every source and what we spent for you.